There is no growth agenda for Yorkshire without family businesses.

There is no growth agenda for Yorkshire without family businesses.

Thomas Martin, Chair Arco Ltd and the Yorkshire Regional Business Engagement Board

Right across Yorkshire, home-grown family businesses are wondering – what just happened? In 76 minutes, the Chancellor delivered a Budget that undermines hundreds of years of family business ownership in our region.

Yorkshire has a proud history of family businesses. The deep-seated values that we prize of hard work, responsibility, respect, community spirit run deep in businesses like mine, which has been trading in family ownership for 140 years.

Others like AW Hainsworth have been doing the same for 240 years, Bettys & Taylors 105 years, Howarth Timber 184 years. The list goes on.

But in the Budget the Chancellor put all this under threat by changing long-established policies that support us.

For the first time in almost 50 years, family businesses across Yorkshire will be subject to Inheritance Tax when the owner dies – something that is forcing many to wonder whether they will ever be able to pass on their business to their children. And whether their children will be able to afford to take them on?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not arguing that family business owners shouldn’t pay their fair share of tax. We already do. Britain’s 4.8 million family businesses contribute more than £200 billion in tax every year – about a quarter of all taxes received by the Government.

But let’s be clear, for someone inheriting a family business, they are not taking on a prized Ming vase, family heirloom or nice house. It is the fabric of business. Family famers too are facing exactly the same threat. The tools of their business will also be taxed when they are passed to the next generation threatening food security and environmental management as assets are used to achieve maximum economic return.

The problem is that whilst Inheritance Tax is a tax on the individual, in the case of family businesses it becomes a direct cost to the company.

Take an average business valued at £8m, a family member inheriting it will now be expected to pay 20% tax on that (minus the first £1 million) to take it on when the owner dies. Not many people have that kind of money kicking around and so they will need to take a dividend from the company. That will be subject to additional tax rate of 39.5% meaning companies will be double taxed.

The cost will ultimately be paid through reduced investment, less growth, fewer jobs and more redundancies as companies divert money to cover a future tax liability. In worst case scenarios, neither the business or family member can pay the Inheritance Tax and will be forced to sell the business, or parts of it.

When you add on the massively increased burdens this Government is placing on business through increased employers National Insurance contributions, new employment legislation and minimum wage, the changes to Inheritance Tax are draining what little confidence we had left.

Business needs confidence. It imbues a sense of certainty that underpins the very nature of private enterprise, allowing companies of all sizes to take risks and invest in both their communities and people to generate long-term prosperity.

Home-grown family businesses do that better than most. We aren’t ‘here today gone tomorrow’ fly-by-nights. We take pride in what we do. It is our name above the door and we work hard to protect that whilst respecting our employees and the communities we serve.

The sheer bloody mindedness of Yorkshire folk has done them proud for generations. The fact there are so many long-established family businesses here in Yorkshire is testament to that. We are a proud county with a rich history.

But in a 76 minute Budget speech the Chancellor has unwound hundreds of years of patient planning and investment that will likely result in lower taxes, lower growth and lower employment.

I cannot believe this is what the Chancellor had in mind when she announced the closing of what she and others have called a “loophole.” As the Chairman of a long-established family business, and a director of Family Business UK, I am calling on the Government to consult with us to reverse this change and protect our proud heritage of family business.

END.

This article originally appeared in the Yorkshire Post on 14th November 2024.

Find out more about FBUK’s Back Family Businesses Campaign here.

Removing BPR could cost Billions

Removing BPR could cost Billions

New research commissioned by Family Business UK shows that £29billion and 391,000 jobs could be lost from the economy if policies that support family businesses are removed.

The findings come from CBI Economics, which was commissioned by FBUK to model the impact of removing Business Property Relief and Gift Holdover Relief.

Both BPR and GHR have been the subject of intense speculation ahead of the Budget, with reports they could be removed or reformed.

But data from CBI Economics suggests that removing the policies could have serious, long-term economic consequences with:

  • 48% of family firms reducing investment
  • 30% reducing headcount
  • 24% expecting lower turnover
  • 16% suggesting they would be forced to sell-up to pay an Inheritance Tax charge
  • 347,000 micro businesses and sole traders could be forced to close.

Neil Davy, CEO of FBUK said: “This research shows the detrimental impact removing BPR and GHR would have on investment, employment and receipts into the Treasury. It would undermine the economic growth and long-term prosperity the government has committed to deliver, and which family businesses want to support and contribute to.”

The Government’s stance on BPR and GHR has been unclear for months with suggestions that removing BPR could raise money for the Treasury at a time when public finances are stretched. However, our research suggests that removing them could actually cost the Government money.

The modelling shows that over the next 5 years, scrapping BPR and GHR could raise £7.4bn for the Treasury BUT it could result in an £8.4bn decrease in tax revenue caused by the reduction in family business activity and the wider negative impacts on the UK economy”.

Neil Davy continues: “We’ve been highlighting the critical role that BPR plays in providing a stable regulatory environment for family businesses to trade with confidence, operate on a level playing field with other models of business ownership, and continue to invest in people, jobs, skills, R&D and new products and services.

“This new research shows the unintended consequences of removing the policies that support family businesses. Doing so would be a self-defeating move by any government elected on a mandate to deliver long-term economic growth and prosperity.”

Dr Peter White, Managing and Technical Director of Nova Laboratories, a Family Business UK member, added:

“After eighteen years working in the NHS, I started Nova Laboratories from nothing. Thirty years later, the Company has a global reputation, employs 280 local staff, and next year will export 65% of our products and services.

“The financial certainty provided by both spousal relief and Business Property Relief allowed me to re-invest everything back into the Company, rather than accumulate my family’s personal wealth. Over 95% of my family’s paper wealth is therefore in the Company’s shares, and not in personal assets or liquid cash. This approach allowed the Company to grow steadily and sustainably, and my son has spent a decade in the business developing a 20-year plan for its continued growth and success.

“Unless both these reliefs are maintained in full, the incentive to create and grow a successful business, continually re-invest in the business, and provide smooth and stable succession will be completely lost in the UK.”

END.

 

 

Westminister debates family businesses and BPR

Westminister debates family businesses and BPR

Family businesses have taken centre stage in Parliament ahead of the Budget, with MPs debating Business Property Relief (BPR) and its essential role supporting family-owned firms across the country.

A Westminster Hall debate led by Harriet Cross, Conservative MP for Gordon and Buchan heard from MPs about how BPR and APR (Agricultural Property Relief) is being used to support businesses and family-owned farms in their constituencies.

The debate, which took place less than two weeks ahead of the Labour’s first budget, gave MPs a chance to raise their serious concerns with Government.

Opening the debate, Harriet Cross MP underlined the important role played by BPR and APR incentivising family businesses up and down the country.

 

Will Forster, Liberal Democrat MP for Woking, told Members about the importance of family businesses to local economies like Woking.

 

Nigel Huddlestone, the Shadow Financial Secretary, said the Government must hear the concerns and fears MPs had expressed on behalf of their constituents about potential changes to inheritance tax relief, including BPR.

Huddleston reminded the House that prior to the election, family businesses believed they had received assurances on BPR from the Labour party and called for those assurances to be reiterated.

Responding for the Government, James Murry, the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury acknowledge that many Members had raised their uncertainties ahead of the budget, including on BPR.

He acknowledged the ongoing debate and the work of Family Business UK in calling for BPR to be retained.

The Budget will take place on 30 October.

You will be able to read Family Business UK’s response after the Chancellor has delivered the Budget to Parliament.

You can read FBUK’s pre-budget submission here.

Visit our Back Family Businesses campaign page here.